In Kurz: 0.002% von 530 000 geimpften hatten eine ernste Nebenwirkung - also deine Chance das was ernstes schlimmeres passiert ist 1 zu 50 000. Und alle mit diesen Nebenwirkungen sind wieder vollständig gesund geworden.
Besser auf der Webseite lesen, da ist es viel schöner formatiert
ZitatFactCheck asked the group Regret to provide evidence to support the contention that the HPV vaccine caused the health problems suffered by the 400 young women it represents, and that the HPV vaccine is not safe.
A spokesperson for the group confirmed it was their view that “on balance, the risks of taking the HPV vaccine outweigh the benefits”.
On the question of a cause-and-effect relationship, the group told us:
We question the safety of the vaccine, but without the appropriate independent investigative tools, we cannot establish the causation link [sic]. They did not provide any evidence showing that Gardasil caused the health problems observed among the girls in question.
On the wider question of the safety of Gardasil in general, Regret directed us to articles reporting decreasing uptake of the vaccine in various jurisdictions, and criticism of it, but only one scientific study.
The fact that uptake of the vaccine is decreasing in a small number of countries, or that its safety has been questioned, does not, of course, constitute evidence that it is not safe.
And in reality, the Canadian study highlighted by Regret does not give any support to their contention – quite the opposite. Its authors even expressly stated that the rate of side effects following HPV vaccination was “low”.
The research, published in April 2016, tracked the rate of AEFI (adverse events following immunisation), as well as hospitalisation and emergency department admissions within 42 days of vaccination, among women and girls aged nine and older in the Canadian province of Alberta, between 2006 and 2014.
In 99.2% of cases, the HPV vaccine administered was Gardasil.
The study found:
Out of 528,913 doses of a HPV vaccine, 198 adverse events (side effects) were reported. That’s 0.04% Out of 195,270 girls and women vaccinated, 192 reported adverse events. That’s 0.1% Of those 192, four reported an adverse event serious enough to warrant hospitalisation within 42 days Therefore, four out of 195,270 vaccinated individuals experienced a serious side effect following vaccination. That’s 0.002% Of the 198 adverse events reported, the outcome was known for 171. All 171 ended in full recovery Of the 195,270 patients vaccinated, 958 (0.49%) visited the hospital within 42 days – 35.3% within two weeks, and 64.7% after two weeks Only four of these had reported a side effect from the vaccination Of the 195,270 patients vaccinated, 19,351 visited the emergency department (ED) within 42 days. That’s 9.9% Regret presented the fact that almost 10% of those vaccinated visited the ED within 42 days as evidence supporting the risks of the HPV vaccine.
But this ignores the fact that only 0.002% of those vaccinated reported a serious side effect (one warranting a trip to the hospital).
In other words, those hospital and emergency department visits were not linked to the vaccination, not even in the minds of the women and girls themselves.
Screen Shot 2016-09-11 at 4.05.55 PM
The “Research” page of the group’s website contains mostly op-ed articles, speeches or interviews criticising the vaccines, but among the more substantive items listed are:
An article which claims clinical trials of Gardasil and Gardasil 9 showed a rate of serious side effects of 2.5% and 2.3%. On even cursory examination, this is very misleading. In reality, between one month and four years after vaccination, only four out of 15,705 individuals had a side effect that was determined to be vaccine-related. That’s 0.03%.
Once again, vaccinated people getting sick in the normal course of events (including up to four years after vaccination) is falsely being presented as caused by vaccination.
A Danish study which described a pattern of “autonomic dysfunction” (problems with breathing, heartrate and digestion) among 53 vaccinated patients. It noted that it could not confirm or dismiss a causal link with the vaccine, but called for further research. However, the consistency of the symptoms observed is surely due to the fact that:
This was a retrospective analysis based on 75 patients consecutively referred to the Syncope [Fainting] Unit from May 2011 to December 2014 for a head-up tilt test due to ?orthostatic intolerance and symptoms compatible with autonomic dysfunction as suspected side effect following vaccination with the Q-HPV vaccine. In other words, the study found a strong pattern of autonomic dysfunction among a few dozen patients who were referred to a specialised unit, with symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. Which is hardly shocking.
A 2012 study which concluded that certain HPV vaccines “pose an inherent risk for triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies [blood vessel disease]“. That alarming conclusion was based on autopsy analysis and tissue samples taken from the brains of two young women (19 and 14), who had died six months and two weeks after HPV vaccination.
The study was so alarming that the US government’s Centers for Disease Control (CDC) established a working group to examine it. In a public response, they found several serious flaws:
The authors’ diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis (blood vessel inflammation in the brain) was invalid The way they tested for the presence of vaccine-related proteins lacked proper controls and was “questionable” The authors did not use the right equipment to properly identify vaccine particles, and did not use control samples, so the relevance of what they did find “cannot be determined” They did not present enough information to be able to examine possible alternative causes of death. And for the record, out of the many millions of HPV vaccine doses administered in the US over the years, the CDC working group found one report of cerebral vasculitis (the disease the article claims is caused by the vaccine), 45 days after a vaccination.
And that was in a woman who already had immune system difficulties and several medical problems to begin with.
In the medical literature, they found two cases of vasculitis after vaccination (neither of them in the brain, which is the focus of this study), and both of them attributed to a blood vessel disorder called Henoch-Schonlein Purpura.
Conclusion A very large number of clinical trials and scientific studies, some outlined above, have proven HPV vaccines, including Gardasil, to be highly effective in preventing the virus that causes 70% of cervical cancer These trials and studies have also proven HPV vaccines, including Gardasil, to be very safe, with extremely low rates of serious possible side effects What little scientific research has been done contradicting this overwhelming consensus, has consistently been shown to be flawed and unreliable There is no evidence whatsoever that HPV vaccination caused the health difficulties observed among the 400 young women represented by the group Regret The claim that “On balance, the risks of taking the HPV vaccine outweigh the benefits” is FALSE by a very wide margin. In fact, the evidence is unequivocal.